Sep 19, 2010 'Truth Excavated' - The ASI Report on the excavations in 2003 at Ayodhya. September 19, 2010 at 00:31:10 BEFORE THE VERDICT OF ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT ABOUT THE RAM. 24 thoughts on “ Ayodhya – Archaeological survey of India report ” Pingback: Ram Temple at Ayodhya – Will Muslims Heed to Nazneen? Arise Bharat.

'Truth Excavated' - The ASI Report on the excavations in 2003 at Ayodhya September 19, 2010 at 00:31:10 BEFORE THE VERDICT OF ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT ABOUT THE RAM JANMABHOOMI ISSUE PLEASE READ THIS REPORT BY ARCHEOLOGICAL DEPARTMENT OF INDIA. SPREADING THE TRUTH IS NEEDED. The Archaeological Survey of India Report The Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) excavated the mosque site at the direction of the Lukhnow Bench Bench of the Allahabad High Court in 2003.

The archaeologists reported evidence of a large 10th century structure similar to a Hindu temple having pre-existed the Babri Masjid. Afro Samurai Resurrection Soundtrack Download Zip. A team of 131 laborers including 29 Muslims -- who were later on included on the objections of the Muslim side-, was engaged in the excavations. On June 11th, 2003 the ASI issued an interim report that only listed the findings of the period between May 22nd and June 6th, 2003. In August 2003 the ASI handed a 574-page report to the Lukhnow Bench of the Allahabad High Court. The ASI, who examined the site, issued a report of the findings of the period between May 22nd and June 6th, 2003.

The Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) report of August 2003 is the fifth on the historical topography of Ayodhya. Cunningham conducted the first survey in Ayodhya in 1862-63 followed by another in 1889-91 by A. Professor A.K. Narain conducted the third excavation in Ayodhya in 1969-70, and finally, Professor B.B. Lal conducted a more intensive and revealing study of the area in 1975-76. The intention of Cunningham's survey was to re-locate Buddhist sites and to establish the Buddhist antecedents of Ayodhya.

He accepted the association of Ayodhya with the traditions of Rama and asserted that the present-day Ayodhya was the Ayodhya of the Ramayana years. He also concluded that the cities of Visakha, Saketa and Ayodhya were the same (A.E. Cunningham, 'Report of the Proceedings of the Archaeological Surveyor to the Government of India for the Season of 1862-63,' in Journal of Asiatic Society of Bengal, 1865). Fuhrer's report is an extension of the earlier report. He tried to confirm Rajput presence in Ayodhya in the 11th and 12th centuries A.D. By referring to three copper-plate land grants reportedly found in the area (A.

Fuhrer, Report of the Archaeological Survey of India (New Series), Volume II, 1891). Surprisingly, of the three plates only one is known, the other two remain unknown and only facsimile copies of these grants were available to the Asiatic Society of Bengal (Centenary Review of the Asiatic Society of Bengal, From 1784 to 1883, Calcutta,1885). Lounge Lizard Session Keygen Free.

Narain observed that the excavated sites indicated human habitation as old as the 5th century B.C. He was also convinced that there was evidence of strong Buddhist presence in the area (Indian Archaeology 1969-70 - A Review, page 40). He fixed the antiquity of Ayodhya to early 17th century B.C. Lal excavated the mound of the Babri Masjid and observed 'a fairly compact and working sequence for the antiquity of the place from its first settlement over the natural soil'. His conclusions were interesting: 'The occupational phases of the mound appears to have continued up to circa third century A.D., represented by several structural phases. In the earlier stages, the houses were of wattle and daub or mud, followed by those of baked bricks. In the Janma Bhumi area a massive wall of bricks was observed, which may perhaps be identified as a fortification-wall.'