I have made a thread in May 2012, about INTP serial killers, and after understanding more about the INTJ personality type, I discovered that they are actually INTJ. This thread corrects an earlier mistake, as well as mentioning a few other INTJ, who either killed, or is directly involved with mass killings. With a few real-life serial killers being typed as Guardians. 3 Responses to “MBTI: Hollywood’s Killers.

This sub is open to all types. Check the and before posting.

We have a INTJ Links: - a well-written and consistent description of the INTJ type and its functions. - an alternative description of INTJs in general. MBTI Links: - a test that calculates your most likely type based on function usage and developmental states. - a primer on Carl Jung’s theory of psychological types. - a helpful list of each type and their functional stack. - a graph showcasing the general rarity of each type.

- a useful article on pitfalls to avoid when typing yourself. Filter by Topic: - - - - - - - - - - Related Subs: - - - Subs For Other Types: MBTI in general - NT “Rationals” - NF “Idealists” - SP “Artisans” - SJ “Guardians” - . I find them fascinating from a biological/neuroscience perspective, as in what goes wrong in their brains to make them this way. And what is the combination of biology and environment -- if any -- that leads to the production of a serial killer.

A lot of them also strike me as kind of a waste of potential. Consider someone like Ted Bundy, who was charming, articulate, and incredibly intelligent. Were it not for the whole murdering psychopath thing, who knows what he may have accomplished. Well to be fair, they can't help having a fucked up brain that is fundamentally broken any more than I can help being asthmatic. That's not to say that what they do is in any way less vile, but maybe 'scum' isn't quite the right word.

Encore Crack Version here. I think of scum as those who are capable of empathy and just choose to ignore it and hurt others anyway. But what you say here actually brings up an interesting point in terms of perceptions of mental diseases.

The public at large feels sympathy for the schizophrenic who kills someone yet revulsion for the psychopath who commits the same crime. Both have seriously broken brains and legitimate conditions that they cannot help. It's just kind of interesting how we react to them differently. Ism Dongle Not Installed here. I was thinking in terms of venomous snakes, like pit vipers, king cobras and black mambas. It depends on where you're living I guess. I can assure you, that your experience with snakes would be quite different, if you were living in sub-Saharan Africa.

Spy Central Locking Manual. If you're interacting with venomous snakes, on a consistent basis, you need to exercise caution. Antivenin is only effective within a certain window, and only once, per snake, I think. Ultimately, I'm not trying to demonize snakes.

I was simply making a point, about understanding, and respecting, dangerous situations. I feel that we've gone off on a tangent however, but thanks for sharing. It's entire possible to have an abstract appreciation of how something was done that is removed from what was done. It is a very simplistic view to label someone based on an outcome and not scrutinise them further. There are important lessons to be learned from most people who change the world. However, many people choose to live in a simple world.